Ambiguous claim language becomes machine-checkable predicates. Overlap with prior art is decided by a solver, and royalties stream along the dependency tree that falls out of it.
A patent claim is written to be argued over, not to be computed. FluidIP parses the independent claim into first-order logic predicates — in the reference case, eighteen of them from Claim 1 — and from there the question “is this already covered?” becomes a satisfiability query rather than an examiner's judgement.
| Metric | Legacy patent offices | FluidIP protocol |
|---|---|---|
| examination duration | 2 to 4 years of backlog | sub-minute automated SMT proof |
| infringement resolution | years of high-court litigation, $2M+ in fees | algorithmic AST equivalence proof |
| royalty distribution | lump sums behind closed NDAs and lawyers | continuous micropayment streaming mesh |
| prior-art coverage | manual examiner keyword searching | topological DAG satisfiability check |
git clone https://github.com/KELLERBABG/FluidIP.git cd FluidIP && cargo test # verify a claim against the local prior-art SMT corpus